बुधवार, 1 नवंबर 2017

'ANNA' IN :' GHALIB' OUT

                                           ‘ANNA’  IN    :  ‘GHALIB’  OUT
      Day before morning Newspapers reported that the ‘Oxford English Dictionary’ has included  70  new words of Indian origin  such as ‘Anna’,’Vada’,’Gulab Jamun’, ‘Jugaad’, ‘Dadagiri’ ,’Surya Namaskar’,’achha’,’Bapu’. What an apt example of ‘Inclusiveness’ and ‘keeping the windows open’ ( Even when the doors are being closed-Brixit!!, but that is aside).Perhaps it is on account of such an ‘ideology’that the country remains current even in difficult times and relevant in the field of Arts and Science! But look at us 70 years post Independence we are working overtime with Dina Nath Batras ‘pulping’ books and removing the name of ‘Ghalib’( once Poet Laureate) from our History books; erasing ‘Urdu’ words from our text!! With what tools we intend to Skill India?
   
The inclusion of  Indian words ( Indian English) owe also to the rising stock of Indians worldwide and this is an acceptance of that fact. However it also is their investment to ensure the wider appeal of the Language in India.


मंगलवार, 31 अक्तूबर 2017

POWER OF THE CRACKERS

                                        POWER OF THE CRACKERS

Well Diwali has come and gone and one big gain from it appears to be the reduction in ’Crackers’. The Supreme Court ruling in stopping sales in Delhi NCR and the overall environment awareness helped in the matter. However; this is only a beginning and we have much to travel to eliminate this tendency. One newspaper article did point out an      
interesting fact that usage of ‘fire crackers’ is a 20th century phenomenon when in 1920s the ‘Nadars’ established the Cracker  factory in Shivkashi. I do remember that when I was in Nilgiris in the late nineties the crackers sold very cheap and one stocked them too.
  
As children we did look forward to Diwali essentially for bursting crackers but over the years the awareness that it is environmentally harmful distanced us from its usage my daughter also opposed it when she learnt in school about its harmful affects. The occasional reports in media about the use of child labour in cracker factories of Shivkashi and the lack of safety norms  being adhered to made our resolve stronger. But; this problem will go only with social awareness and not with legislations. Similar to the campaign against smoking and more specific ‘passive smoking’.
I also sense that people use ‘fire crackers’ as a manifestation of their anger against the system/elite /ruling class. Further to assert their position in society. Very many time I have observed that this assertion in exhibited from the ‘slums’ of Mumbai the ‘Jhuggi Jhopri’ areas where people may have little to survive but save to assert their presence during  Diwali. They start much before Diwali and go on for days after Diwali. The powerful and feudal in small towns and Tehsils specially in Northern and Central India  fire Guns  during  Marriage ceremonies called ‘Haersh Firing’ ( happy firing). This too is manifestation of Power through the barrel of the Gun.


    Therefore this issue is also related to our social  problem where the poor assert as license during Diwali their sense of presence and anger ( sub consciously ) and the Feudal assert their position sort of reaffirm their position by ’Haersh firing’ during marriages. Festivals then do not remain as occasion of festivity but simply showing of social positions.

शनिवार, 15 जुलाई 2017



JAGGA  JASOOS- A BLAND  MUSICAL  JOURNEY

Arrogance takes the better of us sometimes; and this time it is Anurag Basu who is victim of excess and indulgence. Bad films are caused  by creative failures, essentially; however sometimes our sympathies with the star or the director dilutes our response and understanding specially in an emotionally buoyant  country as ours. Anurag Kashyap   indulged in ‘Bombay Velvet’ his brother in 'Besharm’ on both occasions Ranbir Kapoor  suffered the most. There is History of such indulgence and failure. Guru Dutt failed in ‘Kagaj ke Phool’ which in my opinion was flawed.  Devanand  indulged in ‘Ishq Ishq Ishq’ touted to be   another Musical but the very music fell short of expectations. Ram Gopal Verma also experimented with musical in ‘Mast’ which failed.
  
The problem with’Jagga Jasoos’ is that there is no foundation. The story/screenplay is very thin. The so called selling point-Music/Musical is prosaic , but for few independent songs. The premise of this musical is western as we have seen in ‘My fair Lady’/’Sound of Music’/’ Fiddler on the roof’. But the western musical outfit does not jell with Indian emotion/setting and after sometimes gets on your nerves!! It seems flat and routine. Anurag Basu should have taken a page from our cinema and noted that we have made many musicals( our roots are musical) ; but on solid story foundation- Barsaat by Raj Kapoor; ’Baiju Bawra’ starring Bharat Bhushan and Meena Kumari. ‘Heer Ranjha’ of Chetan Anand was truly musical and despite having  Priya Rajwans ( a weak heroine) was a success because of its strong foundation.Here  the filmmaker mounts the film on the shoulders of Ranbir Kapoor and proceeds on musical cartoon journey  with erratic structure  which  falters from the beginning.It also reminds of ‘Barfi’ in terms of setting ( here he moves further from Darjeeling to Manipur)/Ranbir’s inadequacy/father-son relationship and music

  
The only source of happiness is Ranbir who emits such subtle emotions that one feels sad for his choices and luck. He seems to have been conned most by mediocre filmmakers posing as creative masters- ‘Roy’;’Aye dil hai mushkil’’Bombay velvet’,’Besharam’. As far as Mr Basu is concerned this is his second big indulgence in terms of failure, money and time. ‘Kites’ was the first one!! 

सोमवार, 3 जुलाई 2017

NEHRU- ‘THE VARIETY AND UNITY OF INDIA’









NEHRU- ‘THE  VARIETY   AND   UNITY   OF   INDIA’

Jawaharlal Nehru in his book ,’Discovery Of India’ writes the following in the section titled, ’The Variety and Unity Of India’:

“ All of us , I suppose have varying pictures of our native land and no two persons  will think exactly alike .When I think of India ,I think of many things ;of broad fields dotted with innumerable small villages ;of towns and cities I have visited ;of the magic of the rainy season which pours life into the dry parched -up land and converts it suddenly into a glistening expanse of beauty and greenery , of great rivers and flowing waters ; of the Khyber Pass in all its bleak surroundings ; of the Southern tip of India ; of people ,individually and in the mass; and, above all of the Himalayas, snow capped ,or some mountain valley in Kashmir in the spring, covered with new flowers ,and with a brook bubbling and gurgling through it. We make and preserve the pictures of our choice , and so I have chosen this mountain background rather than the more normal picture of a hot , subtropical country. Both would be correct, for India stretches from the tropics right up to the temperate regions , from near the equator to the cold heart of Asia.”

Now ;how much of the leader and the person could be ascertained from his writing. The very start of the paragraph shows his inclusive and  diverse  world when he says that all of us  have varying picture of our native land and that no two persons  would think alike. Then he describes his picture of India and it is complex and wide. He talks of villages because he had been to many villages campaigning for Congress for 1937 elections. He talks of rains as he liked the rainy season and in fact had  visited Mumbai once only to observe the  monsoons! He talks of villages because he had visited rural India not only during his initial years in United Province but later as the primary leader of his party. He talks of people both ‘individually’ and in ‘masses’ for he had addressed numerous meetings and was always in eye contact with the ‘masses’ who were his source of energy and inspiration and  who were the foundation of the movement and who loved him. And then he talks of Kashmir which was dear to him and he had been there visiting many times and though liberal and democrat had always wanted the valley portion of Kashmir in India for its beauty and uniqueness and where from his ancestors had arrived in to the plains! It is  a mixed picture even though he picks the picture of Kashmir as  his choice. He is never definitive; always weighing all sides and views . Accommodative and restless ,concerned of the opinion of others as he says that even though he had chosen the snow-capped  Kashmir the ’picture’ of others would be as right( Both would be correct) because India stretches from tropics to temperate to cold .Such was Nehru!


शनिवार, 13 मई 2017

CHANNA MERE AA MEREAA CHANNA MERE AA ....

CHANNA   MERA AA   MERA AA ,CHANNA MERA  AA   MERA AA…… -O PIYA

Sab Darvaje khirkiyan bund theen
Sarak par sannata tha
Sard raat; sab shant shokjada
Hamle ke baad ka maahol aur chupchupi
Hawa mein bagawat ki boo
Sab tanha !sab tanha!
Shak shikayat ranjish;
Donodiwane
Koi milne  ke aasar nahi
Sab marham sab dava nakam
Samvad ka silsala na huva shuru
Pal lamhe din raat mahine mausam saal badle
Par barf galne ko nahi
Pani dhoop bijli toofan be asar!

Phir ek din; raat ke sannate mein
Gungunane ki awaz..;
Paas aa paas aa to suna;
Channa mera aa mera aa channa mera aa channa mera aa meraaa.. o piya

Ek halki si muskerahat  Jisko ko hansi
Mein tabdil hone ka intzar.
Chalen Karen dil ki baat
Chalen Karen dil ki baat!



सोमवार, 24 अप्रैल 2017

MARRIAGE SONGS

MARRIAGE SONGS


‘Song and Dance’ , are an inseparable ingredients of Indian Marriage ceremony . Cutting across community and caste lines.’Sangeet’ ceremony which was once restricted to ladies only has wider participation now and an evening prior to marriage is invariably   reserved for the function.
But my intent is not to highlight the above; it was just a backdrop. My purpose is to express how happy I felt recently when I attended the marriage of my colleague’s daughter at Delhi. How tradition and modernity were in display to my delight.



   At the right time the ‘Baraat’ arrived and the Groom was received with the traditional ‘Aarti’, but what attracted my attention were the Sanskrit ‘Hymns’ being sung collectively by the immediate family members. It was rhythmic, melodious, pious and perfect. The Groom in Sherwani and pagri stood smiling. It was over in less than ten minutes but gave the occasion its solemnity and standard. Well! This was contribution of the elders. Thereafter the Groom was escorted to the hall where most of guests were waiting for ‘Jai-Mala’ ceremony. The Bride arrived and they stood facing each other. Just them their group of friends broke into a song, “ baharon phool barsao mera mehboob aaya hai….”( Mohammad Rafi from ‘Suraj’). This was a pleasant surprise for me as mostly during such times the pundit again takes over or is hovering close by. But here the modernity was in control. The song was of sixties when the parents of the couple would be in school, but the young connected to the song. And the there was another,-“ do sitaron ka zameen par hai Milan aaj ki raat…”( Mohamad Rafi and Lata from ‘Kohinoor’). Which was made for the occasion .
  
    What struck me was the familiarity of this young generation with the old hindi film songs even when they may not be aware of the film to which they belonged. Perhaps this is one link through which we can relate to them better!

रविवार, 23 अप्रैल 2017

THE LEGACY OF SHAILENDRA

THE   LEGACY   OF   SHAILENDRA

Once I was listening  to a TV programme  recorded by Doordarshan in  You-tube. It showed  an old clipping of Firaq Gorakhpuri  where he was explaining what Great Literature was: “ Great literature was that literature which conveys great ideas/thoughts in a vocabulary of a child”, he said. Thus implying that  the beauty of language was in its simplicity.
   
Shailendra;the legendary lyricist of  Hindi Cinema in my opinion belonged to the above category which Firaq Sahab enunciated.  He did possess the talent to put across in simple lines great social and political thoughts. Songs of Barsaat, Awaara, Shree420, Jisdesh Mein Ganga Behti hai, Aah, Sangam, Guide , Madhumati, Anari,  Kala Bazaar,  Chori-Chori and numerous others are witness. He wrote in Hindustani Zubaan which had more Hindi words than Urdu in this he was different from  his contemporaries/rivals - Sahir, Shakeel and Majrooh who also wrote in Hindustani but with more Urdu words.

   Who then could be called  the inheritor of his legacy? No one could rise to that level. But perhaps there were three lyricist who came close to him unconsciously/subconsciously  and were inspired/motivated by him, I feel -Neeraj,Indeevar and Anand Bakshi.


  
   Neeraj  became famous for his song in Nai umar ki nai fasal( karwan guzar gaya gubar dhek te rahe) and  ,gave some memorable songs for Navketan Banner and other films - Prem Pujari( phoolon ke rang se…dil ki kalam se…),Gambler( dil aaj shayar he gam aaj nagma hai…),Sharmili( megha chaye aadhi raat), Tere mere sapne ( han mene kasam li…).Neeraj was also very prolific in Hindi Poetry circle and has many admirers. He remained popular in Kavi-Sammelans for long. Indeevar was also contemporary of Shailendra but Shailendra made his mark in forties and Indeevar came later.However some songs of Indeevar are class and put him in Shailendra’s league- Saraswati Chandra( chandan sa badan, phool tumhe bheja hai khat mein)), Anokhi Raat ( ohre taal mile nadi ke jal mein nadi mile sagar mein..) Safar( zindagi ka safar,jeevan se bhari teri aakhen).Indeevar wrote for long and Kalyanji Anandji put music to his most  songs. He was regular in films of Manoj Kumar and Feroj Khan’s banner. Anand Bakshi needs no introduction ,he was simple and sweet and wrote perhaps for the longest period. He was favourite of Laxmi Kant Pyrelal, but also wrote many songs for R D Burman and even for S D Burman. Despite writing so many songs he gave high  standard music material – Aradhna( mere sapno ki rani), Aapki kasam( zindagi safar mein guzar jate hein jo mukam who phir nahi aate)Do Raaste ( bindiya chamkegi, khiza ke phool mein aati nahi bahar kabhi..mere nasib…),Ajnabi( ek ajnabi hasina se mulakat ho gayi, bheegi bheegi raton mein)Amar Prem( chingari koi bharke,kuch to log kahenge) are few examples.
   
From the above some justification could be given that Shailendra’s legacy was followed by some important lyric writers, but no one can match the genius of Shailendra for his numerous songs inspire young song makers and qualify the definition of Great Literature!


शुक्रवार, 3 फ़रवरी 2017

TO LOVE AND DIE- PUP's LIFE

TO   LOVE   AND   DIE-  PUP’S     LIFE  



Last  afternoon on way from Sagar to Bhopal in bus. On way to Mumbai .Bus stops at 

Vidisha for Tea. I get down. Am greeted by this loving pup, tail

wagging. I offer him 

small digestive biscuits  given by the bus people.He gobbles all one by one. As if 
waiting for me. I feel good. He sits happy. I ask for a cup of tea. I take his photo. As I 
sip I see him crossing the road. The others have also been watching. Suddenly ; a 
speeding car is seen and the pup is run over. We all watch the cruel twist of life. The 
tea  seller says,” Aaapki photo uski aakhri photo thi”. I am unable to express anything. The bus horns for us. I get up. As I am about to board, I turn to him.  Salute my loving friend. Perhaps; he was waiting to make me happy, just for 
one moment, and then depart in this cruel manner.

मंगलवार, 10 जनवरी 2017

FEROZE ALLAHABADI!

  FEROZE  ALLAHABADI !


    Just finished with the book ‘Feroze –The forgotten Gandhi’ by Bertil Falk a Swedish writer.  I was always  keen to know more about Feroze as he has emerged as a much sympathetic character over the years; as someone who did not get his due; as someone who was victimised by the Nehru family. As I read information on him in the various references and articles my interest grew. When this bound book appeared I quickly purchased it and read it within reasonable time ( I am a slow reader).

     It is a fairly OK account of Feroze by the author largely relying on his many years of intermittent interaction with those who were close or known to Feroze. Some newspaper research. However to a Feroze watcher it may leave unsatiated. None the less  certain important information emerges which may be interesting to many and particularly to Allahabadis.

   Birth of Feroze is mired in controversy as the writer with some good research / interviews brings out that he was a  love child of Mr Kakkar ( Father of the famous  Allahabad Lawyer Shyam Nath Kakkar, -Solicitor General of India)) and  Parsi Surgeon Ms Shirin Commissariat who was unmarried. Well ! that makes Feroze half Khatri; if true. And Rajiv, Sanjay, Priyanka and Rahul Gandhis have in their DNA Khatri Characteristics! It is no where stated that Feroze was aware of this ; Was He? If yes his restlessness and complexities could be attributed to his  birth  ambiguity.
 Feroze was a weak child and did have some heart ailment as a child. However he was an active child full of energy and pranks. As student he was mediocre. He graduated from Ewing Christian College Allahabad. He was known to be charitable , largehearted  from the beginning as he would gift his expensive foreign clothes brought for him by his Aunt to poor children. Whenever he went out on vacation/tours he would return back almost empty handed as he would handover his belongings to the needy. This characteristic was his hallmark  right through his political life. Gregarious ( Dost Parast ), talkative ( sometimes loose talk), easy-going  person. He cut his political teeth during the civil disobedience movement, prior to that too he was arrested for participating in  Anti Simon commission agitation but was released after warning as his Aunt was a known person. He continued with his indulgence in anti British agitations prevalent at that time. His entry into Congrees fold was also by chance. He was sitting on the perimeter wall of Ewing Christian College when Congress women wing led by Kamla Nehru ( wife of Jawaharlal Nehru) arrived on the scene . It was a sunny afternoon and Kamla the leader of the group suddenly fainted.Feroze who was observing this group from distance in amusement rushed to the scene and offered help. The next day he went to Anand Bhawan ( the Nehru Residence ) to apologise that he was taking them lightly and met Kamla Nehru. Soon he was helping her in her organization. We must know that it was freedom struggle. The Congress Headquarters was at Swaraj Bhawan , next to Anand Bhawan, and Anaad Bhawan was Buzzing with activity day and night with the comings and goings of people.

   The relationship between Feroze and Kamla is also a high point in the book. They were close owing to being comrades in freedom struggle. But Feroze was deeply devoted to her is established from the fact that he nursed her during her fatal sickness (she died of TB) when very few were by her side and her husband was busy in his political activities or in jail.Being an able organiser he was also sought after. Nehru too has mentioned to Minoo Masani that Feroze was infatuated of Kamala, but perhaps he did not give much seriousness to their relationship. Some important workers of Congress who occupied high office after Independence mischievously put posters remarking about Feroze –Kamala relationship, but Nehru for whatever reason did not go against them.

    Feroze went to jail on many occasions during civil disobedience and Quit India movement. Keshev Dev Malviya, Lal Bahadur Shastri were his colleagues during those days .K D Malviya knew Feroze as Boy Scout where he was his senior.He gives vey positive account of him. Feroze was active in rural areas of Allahabad and was a grass root worker. What is interesting is that he was not a stereotype Parsi, but a very much Allahabadi and Ahiyapuri  ( an area of central Allahabad known for high pitched political activity, where Nehru was born and Pandit Malviya resided) to the core Kamala Prased Mohiley an important leader of Allahabad and P D Tandon have stated that he spoke hindi with a typical Ahiyapuri accent, always.

   Feroze’s marriage to Indira is also an interesting episode in both their lives. Kamla it is reported by M O Mathai was against the marriage  . Feroze had proposed to Indira when she was barely 17 , the proposal was shot down . But he was persistent despite the fact that Indira was having an affair with a German. Feroze followed Indira to England where she went for higher studies . He managed finance through his Aunt and obtained admission in London School of Economics through the contacts of Nehru. Sadly he did not complete his Degree , but was active in Congress Foreign office under Krishna Menon who brought out a pamphlet which was published by Feroze. Therefore even though he did not complete his degree he contributed to freedom struggle and his work was appreciated. During this time he was friends with Nikhil Chakraverty  ( the famous editor of ‘The Mainstream’)and T N Kaul  and other left leaning students and imbibed leftist orientation. He wooed Indira persistently and would visit her on weekends . Their relationship bloomed here and by the end phase of their stay they were living together. Nehru agreed to their marriage despite reservation and after some initial hesitation the Parsi community too agreed . However the Conservative Hindus of Allahabad had opposition but Nehru did not give much heed to them. 
  
  The marriage ceremony is described in great detail through many witnesses. Feroze is dressed in traditional shervani and cap and looked handsome. Indira wore a khadi saree woven by Mahatma Gandhi. She looks pretty. It is a unique vedic ritual and the priest intended to standardise the ceremony and seek recognition . Nehru agrees reluctantly and goes through the ceremony dutifully. It was Feroze who enjoyed most of ceremony ,winking and smiling at his friends. His relatives too are present. He adorns the Parsee Kushti  ( sacred thread) as  deference to his mother and aunt. The ceremony is simple without much pomp as respect to the critical phase in Indian History and the turn of power which was awaited. The couple proceed to Kashmir for long honeymoon under guardianship of Sheikh Abdullah who was a close friend of Nehru at that time.

     He is made the Managing Director of ‘The National Herald’ .The news paper launched by Pandit Nehru from Lucknow. He is not successful here and the paper continues to run in loss despite the able editorship of Chalapati Rau. Chalapati Rao has mixed opinion of Feroze. However later Feroze is successful at the Management  of ‘The Indian Express’. He is separated from his wife and children as Indira is managing the affairs at ‘Teen Murti’ the official residence of Nehru. Feroze is not happy with the situation as he is a family man and resents the absence of it in Lucknow. He has numerous extra maritial affairs, one with a Muslim lady which seriously threatened his marriage but Rafi Ahmed Kidwai ( a cabinet minister and close colleague of Nehru, who was close to Feroze too ) saves the embarrassment  to Nehru and pursues the girl’s parents to end the matter. Feroze comes out as a womaniser . This the writer states emphatically in the beginning of the book and establishes it during the course. This perhaps is one strong reason of their separation even though they remained in touch. Feroze when shifted to Delhi had his own MP’s residence but as a routine had breakfast with Nehrus.

   Feroze was lucky to be part of the Constituent assembly, by virtue of his close relationship with Pandit Pant. He contested his first election from Rai Barelli in 1952 and won with a huge majority owing to his persistent field work and maintaining  the’ common touch’. He nursed his constituency and later was successful in establishing the Degree College, and other educational institutes, Industries etc. His good work enabled him to be elected again in 1957. He started as a backbencher in Parliament but made a mark in three important matters . First the press freedom. Till that time in fifties the newspaper could not publish criticism reported in parliament through the parliament as it was known to be the privilege of the parliamentarians . He ensured that the bill was passed by which all print media , radio were free to report the entire parliamentary proceedings . With this he became the darling of the media. The second was the Nationalization of Insurance Industry/ Life Insurance corporation is the contribution of Feroze. The third was his reporting and debating of ‘Mundra case’, where it was established by a one man enquiry headed by M C Chagla that there was complacency on part of the finance minister by which the Life insurance corporation rendered loss by purchasing below par Mundra shares . The finance minister Krishnamachari had to resign owing moral responsibility. It did not sully Nehru but he did not like it.

 After his first heart attack Feroze is advised to go slow but by then he seemed to have decided to throw caution to the wind. He stopped drinking but continued to smoke. The second heart attack ended his life at the young age of 48.

    The complexity of Feroze is not dealt in detail . The writer intends to pitch him against Nehru and Indira. The instance of Kerala assembly dissolution is quoted as example when Feroze called Indira  a Fascist. But what the writer forgets that at time ‘Fascist’ was a common term and anybody with a streak or minor tendency to be authoritarian was dubbed as ‘Fascist’. Even Nehru was called Fascist by his opponents.
  
    After reading the book one is left a little dissatisfied as the queer lifestyle of Feroze his rise and fall was not analysed. Was his tainted descent contributory to his waywardness? Did separation from his family and devoid of love of children responsible ? It has emerged that he was  a doting father. He loved his children but expected them to work with their hands . He was technically sound and could repair radio, cars etc. He spent quality time with his boys assembling toys and making things by hand. Did the womanising tendency  in Feroze ,which was even apparent during the courtship stage drifted Indira away . It has been stated by Nikhil Chakravarty that during Feroze’s English days he would visit Indira every weekend , but also had an English girlfriend! He further states that when Feroze’s body lied in State at ‘Teen Murti’ and Indira was sitting among the mourners the girlfriends of Feroze arrived to pay respect and howled in the presence of Indira who remained silent and stiff.

     His life could be summed up as a person who contributed in freedom struggle , was a good organiser and maintained touch with common man , was sensitive to corruption, was a good parliamentarian and did not remain in the shadows of his Father in law. Was a kind hearted person , generous , large hearted with a hearty laugh. His negatives were his wayward habits, specially womanising. He surely benefitted from his relationship with Nehru, his election victory cannot be totally his . we should not forget that Nehru was loved by the masses and they would have voted for his son in Law. He was not a good son in Law . He should have held his Father-in-laws hand . Before reporting in parliament the many matters he should have discussed it with him and found equally worthy solution rather that sensationalising issues. He was being revengeful! In Parliament! Nehru sent him to London School Of Economics an opportunity which he did not utilise fully .

  
    What interests me is his loneliness and complexity. His being an essential Allahabadi- left  of centre, sometimes casual, good hearted,  lacking ambition, inclusive ;which could make into an interesting Dramatic Cinema!