मंगलवार, 16 अक्तूबर 2012

BEAUTY IS BUT SKIN DEEP!






BEAUTY IS BUT SKIN DEEP !







       Whilst travelling in Garhwal hills near Lansdowne , recently I was again attracted to the beauty of the pine trees ,uniformly spread over the hills. The smell of pine in addition to its look is distinct. There is variety too in pine , I was amazed to see a pine spread out like a Pipal tree at one place , though most are of conical shape. However if one examines the utility of this seemingly beautiful tree it is limited. It secretes gum from its trunk which is used in preparation of tar for road construction, the wood is used in making of furniture but is of lower variety and no match to teak, saal or shisham etc. The thin leaves are of no use to cattle and shed regularly to create a slippery layer which is dangerous in hill trekking , specially when wet. Moreover it consumes lot of water. In contrast is the grey oak/Indian oak tree commonly called Baanj which is also found in these heights, it does not bear any fruit ,carries ordinary look, gawky appearance, its leaves are of dull green colour, to add to its woes in Indo-Gangetic plain women who are unable to bear children are referred to as 'baanj' an insulting term ,uttered in loud whispers by jealous friends, ambitious mother-in-laws and spoilt sister-in-laws ( nanad). This is burden of feudal India where women were (are?) considered as commodities , primarily for producing children and if any one failed even owing to biological inadequacy of her husband the poor lady carried the burden of being referred to as 'baanj'.

However despite its dull look it is preferred by the villagers and community at large as it is a rich source of water. It retains water in its roots and it is common to see a small but regular water stream near a cluster of 'baanj' trees. It is a saying in hills that where ever you see baanj there will be water. Its leaves are also eaten by cattle .Compared to baanj, pine consumes a lot of water and the initiators of this disastrous practice in hills were the Britishers. They encouraged growth of pine as it looked beautiful and its wood was utilized indiscriminately in timber trade using the rivers in hills for transportation .Despite being innovators in Science their sense of environment was grossly faulty.

Returing to Pine and Baanj ( grey/Indian oak) the nature's analogy restores the belief that 'beauty is but skin deep', but we tend to glorify appearance ! Our preference for FDI at the cost of our small farmers/traders is yet another fatal attraction merely based on 'appearance'.

कोई टिप्पणी नहीं:

एक टिप्पणी भेजें